<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Design Forum &#187; Retail Brands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.designforum.com/tag/retail-brands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.designforum.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Retailers Need to Think Like Revolutionaries</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/why-retailers-need-to-think-like-revolutionaries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/why-retailers-need-to-think-like-revolutionaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 21:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jeffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Brand Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail store design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Washington_Delaware.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-594" title="Washington_Delaware" src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Washington_Delaware.jpg" alt="" width="282" height="278" /></a>

There wasn't an Evolutionary War for a reason. In the pre-dawn of U.S. history, the new settlers wanted more than to just evolve the British rule, it had to be overthrown. A new start, a clean slate. Imagine the pressure that those founding fathers must have felt when deciding that enough was enough, let's try something new. Today, many brands find themselves in the same place. The status quo isn't working. It’s time to differentiate. But I wonder if the ideas of "revolution" and "evolution" aren't being confused.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/why-retailers-need-to-think-like-revolutionaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retail Rollouts: Sustainability is not an Afterthought</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/retail-rollouts-sustainability-is-not-an-afterthought/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/retail-rollouts-sustainability-is-not-an-afterthought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 20:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Rethman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Architecture Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experience Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be most effective, a sustainability initiative must be approached holistically. Sustainability and brand thinking are alike in that they radiate outward from the heart of the business. Just as brand is part of everyone’s job, sustainability can be too. Both brand and sustainability strategies are ideally intertwined, well thought out and well executed from vision to prototype. Typically, companies with this kind of forethought get high marks for differentiation and credibility, such as Whole Foods Market and Starbucks. There’s a direct benefit to the value of the brand. <a href="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Oak_leaves.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-503" title="Oak_leaves" src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Oak_leaves-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a> 

Whether a company has a long history of social responsibility or a newly awakened desire to conserve resources, there are trusted ways to make decisions based on return on investment. If a large fleet of stores is in need of image refreshing, that’s an opportunity to look at controlling energy costs and sustainable building strategies. Even stores primarily in tenant spaces can look at a healthier environment and LEED certification. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/retail-rollouts-sustainability-is-not-an-afterthought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Brands Build Digital Bonds with their Shoppers</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/how-brands-build-digital-bonds-with-their-shoppers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/how-brands-build-digital-bonds-with-their-shoppers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Gonsior</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Brand Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopper Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Retailers looking for great examples of wirelessly connecting with their shoppers have three great brands to look to: American Eagle Outfitters, Netflix and Amazon.com. The continue to differentiate their shopping experiences with intimacy, responsiveness and relevance.

<img src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Lynns-Post-300x200.jpg" alt="" title="Lynn&#039;s-Post" width="300" height="200" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-458" />Even with millions of items for sale, Amazon connects intimately with customers, from its one-click ordering to its ability to become more relevant with each visit. The result is a “barrier to exit” that other brands envy. 

American Eagle excels at aggressively integrating multi-channel marketing tactics into both its traditional and digital campaigns. It connects at all the right touchpoints, which goes a long way towards achieving brand loyalty. This year, AE included a mobile filed in its loyalty program, and used mobile as a point of entry into sweepstakes as well as an alerts program. Calls to action were posted on social networking sites, such as Facebook and Twitter in the form of banner ads, status updates and tweets.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/how-brands-build-digital-bonds-with-their-shoppers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Takes a Strong Brand is to Inspire Shopper Confidence</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/it-takes-a-strong-brand-is-to-inspire-shopper-confidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/it-takes-a-strong-brand-is-to-inspire-shopper-confidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Wartell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopper Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Brand Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopper insights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While we can all agree that price matters more to the consumer than ever, it’s not the be-all, end-all of shopping. At some point, the hunt for best price has to stop. And why it stops is up to the retail brand.

Shoppers attach to brand, not price. Brand—the distinct way you do business—needs to provide a reason to activate the purchase, a reason beyond price. It can be trust, convenience, fun, effortlessness, time savings, fashion or many other factors a brand makes itself known for.

Many retailers have learned the hard way that price-based competition is simply not sustainable. To survive, they need a balanced value proposition unique to the brand that makes the shopper confident she has found the right choice among similar offerings of the product or solution she seeks.

<img class="alignleft" title="Justin's-Post" src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Justins-Post-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" />This year, retailers have made headway in the battle against “sameness” by negotiating exclusive famous name brands, making sure their private labels stand for something besides “cheaper” and by infusing the shopping experience with emotional appeal. One brand that renewed its value-plus-reason image is Old Navy. After veering off into fast fashion inspired by the designer runway, it has returned to bright basic family apparel surrounded and supported by its kitschy sense of humor. Shoppers are returning to the store and business is on the upswing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/it-takes-a-strong-brand-is-to-inspire-shopper-confidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don’t Chase Shoppers, Engage Them with Creativity</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/don%e2%80%99t-chase-shoppers-engage-them-with-creativity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/don%e2%80%99t-chase-shoppers-engage-them-with-creativity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jeffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopper Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Scotts-post.jpg" alt="" title="Scott&#039;s-post" width="375" height="217" class="alignright size-full wp-image-460" />Copying the latest “hot” retailer is an easy way to stay current, to level the playing field. But imitation doesn’t keep you at the top of the shopper’s mind. When a retail brand displays a unique, creative energy—the <a href="http://www.jcrew.com/AST/Navigation/tribeca/ls2.jsp">J. Crew Liquor Store</a> comes to mind—I get a dose of inspiration like an electric charge. I’m not just browsing now, I’m fully engaged because a particular creative spirit permeates every touchpoint for an unmistakable experience. That’s when the brand stops chasing and starts engaging. Maybe it’s my emotions, my ego, or my sense of fun which is always looking to come out and play.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/don%e2%80%99t-chase-shoppers-engage-them-with-creativity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Can’t Buy Creativity by the Pound</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/you-can%e2%80%99t-buy-creativity-by-the-pound/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/you-can%e2%80%99t-buy-creativity-by-the-pound/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Dybvad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Bruces-post.jpg" alt="" title="Bruce&#039;s-post" width="250" height="375" class="alignright size-full wp-image-485" />Businesses in search of competitive advantage are much more comfortable asking design consultants for “innovation” when they should be asking for “creativity,” the birthplace of new ideas.  But creativity, with its faint air of mystery and associations with renegade, non-corporate types, doesn’t seem at home in the world of commerce, where goals are achieved through “procedure” and “knowledge.”

Interbrand Design Forum has seen an increase in the number of retail brands deciding to bring creativity to the table, but a negative tendency to have their procurement officers treat it like a commodity—buying it by the pound. That’s a mistake. Few agencies know how to bring about the environment, the chemistry and the provocation that net the great, disruptive ideas that are actionable in terms of the brand experience. The kind that can move your business to a new place.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/you-can%e2%80%99t-buy-creativity-by-the-pound/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Innovation Reigns at Burger King</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/innovation-reigns-at-burger-king/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/innovation-reigns-at-burger-king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beth Ling</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Interior Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Brand Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restaurant design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever seen a client celebrate as if they’d just won Wimbledon? I got to experience that last night at the Association for Retail Environments awards dinner. The Burger King Whopper Bar took first place in the fast food restaurant category. We were thrilled to see a client who embraces innovation be rewarded for ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/innovation-reigns-at-burger-king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interbrand Design Forum Ranks the Most Valuable U.S. Retail Brands;  Walmart Remains the Top Retailer, Target Leaps to Second</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/interbrand-design-forum-ranks-the-most-valuable-u-s-retail-brands-walmart-remains-the-top-retailer-target-leaps-to-second-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/interbrand-design-forum-ranks-the-most-valuable-u-s-retail-brands-walmart-remains-the-top-retailer-target-leaps-to-second-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Brand Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interbrand Design Forum Ranks the Most Valuable U.S. Retail Brands; Walmart Remains the Top Retailer, Target Leaps to Second Report shows that the strong brands got stronger, while the bottom 25 fell.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/interbrand-design-forum-ranks-the-most-valuable-u-s-retail-brands-walmart-remains-the-top-retailer-target-leaps-to-second-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redefining Brand in an Age of Frugality</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/redefining-brand-in-an-age-of-frugality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/redefining-brand-in-an-age-of-frugality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopper insight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Store plan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designforum.atomicclients.com/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like consumer frugality is settling in for a long stay. For most shoppers, the new thriftiness is a cautious choice in the face of an insecure future. There is money to spend, but there is a new social consciousness around the idea of value. Value has less to do with price and more ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/redefining-brand-in-an-age-of-frugality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Value of Brands</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/the-value-of-brands/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/the-value-of-brands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail store design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designforum.atomicclients.com/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Design Forum has changed its name… sort of.
When we became part of Interbrand in 2002, we kept the name of the company that I founded in 1978. Since then, we’ve evolved from a pure design entity into a multi-disciplined consultancy with a deep pool of talent, including a lot of brand expertise.
“Design Forum” contains valuable ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/the-value-of-brands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
