<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Design Forum &#187; Retail Brands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.designforum.com/category/retail-brands-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.designforum.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Create a Retail Brand Experience, Not a Mess</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/create-a-retail-brand-experience-not-a-mess/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/create-a-retail-brand-experience-not-a-mess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jeffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experience Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Store Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand expertise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=1174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My kid will tell you that I make a mean chocolate chip pancake, but that's only due to my ability to follow the directions on the box. I'm not much of a cook, I'm afraid. I think the most difficult part of cooking a meal is the timing. I admire the planning that goes into starting one thing while thawing another all the while mixing something else and like magic, they all come to the table at the same time. I tried baking a layer cake once and didn't make it out of the frosting phase unscathed. I ended up with a sticky mess and a birthday promise that went unfulfilled. Thankfully, the local bakery bailed me out.

<a href="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/broken_egg.jpg"><img class="alignright" title="broken_egg" src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/broken_egg-300x224.jpg" alt="" width="192" height="143" /></a>Evolving a brand into a new, more engaging incarnation can be just as magic, or if improperly handled, just as messy, resulting in a brand promise that goes unfulfilled. Expectations are always high when we embark on the path that leads to transforming a brand, from both our friends on the client side as well as ourselves. Designers inherently embrace a challenge, and we see every project as an opportunity to make a brand all and the very best that it can be. A lot of teamwork goes into executing a brand—that is, following the recipe we’ve created for an engaging shopping experience. If the recipe isn't followed, your outcome can suffer.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/create-a-retail-brand-experience-not-a-mess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To create memorable brand experiences, engage the senses</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/to-create-memorable-brand-experiences-engage-the-senses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/to-create-memorable-brand-experiences-engage-the-senses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jeffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experience Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Store Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new concepts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=1030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it's that time of year again. Over the next three months, you can find me at my kid's high school athletic field, watching his soccer team practice four nights a week. I rather enjoy those days. They’re a combination of fresh air and pride watching my kid trying to be the next great Springboro High goalkeeper.

As I sit here this evening, there is a slight wind that keeps the flag flying, pulling its cable against the flagpole, creating that hollow metal pinging sound. At the far end of the bleachers, a runner is doing some stair work. Her shoes make a sharp pop, I can feel the vibrations down my row as she hustles up and back down again. The evening sun is warm and the smell of freshly cut grass fills the stadium. Based on these sensations, you could blindfold me and I'd still know where I was.<a href="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Grass.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1032" title="Grass" src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Grass.jpg" alt="" width="314" height="210" /></a>

A few retail brands stand out when I think of sensorial experiences.  How many times have you smelled a Cinnabon before you saw it? You can smell and usually hear an Abercrombie before you come across one in the local mall. A similar volume of music (not to mention the genre) somehow seems very out of place in an Orvis store. Bath and Body Shop does a nice job of seasonal scents to grab your attention.

As retail designers, we rely a lot on the visual sense to communicate to consumers. But let’s not forget that those brands that engage all of the senses create the most memorable experiences.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/to-create-memorable-brand-experiences-engage-the-senses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QSR Wake-up Call. Drive-thru Focus Leads to Customer Drive-by</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/qsr-wake-up-call-drive-thru-focus-leads-to-drive-by/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/qsr-wake-up-call-drive-thru-focus-leads-to-drive-by/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Restaurant design concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Store Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail architects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand expertise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experience Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restaurant design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Store plan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years, the majority of cash at quick service restaurants has gone “through the window."  The growing car culture has dictated a focus on drive-thru efficiency to the point where the dining room has become an afterthought to operators and subsequently a barrier to customers.

<a href="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/DrivethruTom.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-703" title="DrivethruTom" src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/DrivethruTom-300x224.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="224" /></a>
The cost of updating and maintaining a dining room has seemed cost prohibitive to many QSR chains and their franchisees, especially in light of the high drive-thru ratio. But by not offering a unique, pleasant dining experience, they have let the brand image wither on the vine. And it's now coming back to haunt them. I contend that the high drive-thru ratio is in large part due to customers avoiding the “ick” factor of enduring outdated, smelly, deteriorating environments with no sense of place or brand personality. <strong>The dining room <em>is </em>the brand.</strong>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/qsr-wake-up-call-drive-thru-focus-leads-to-drive-by/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retailers Need to Think Like Revolutionaries</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/why-retailers-need-to-think-like-revolutionaries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/why-retailers-need-to-think-like-revolutionaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 21:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jeffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Brand Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail store design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Washington_Delaware.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-594" title="Washington_Delaware" src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Washington_Delaware.jpg" alt="" width="282" height="278" /></a>

There wasn't an Evolutionary War for a reason. In the pre-dawn of U.S. history, the new settlers wanted more than to just evolve the British rule, it had to be overthrown. A new start, a clean slate. Imagine the pressure that those founding fathers must have felt when deciding that enough was enough, let's try something new. Today, many brands find themselves in the same place. The status quo isn't working. It’s time to differentiate. But I wonder if the ideas of "revolution" and "evolution" aren't being confused.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/why-retailers-need-to-think-like-revolutionaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gender Disruption: Boys Like the New Kotex Packaging</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/gender-disruption-boys-like-the-new-kotex-packaging/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/gender-disruption-boys-like-the-new-kotex-packaging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 01:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris Medford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopper Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopper insights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I was finishing up payment at the pharmacy, a young male employee strolled into the area and struck up a conversation with the staff by saying, “That new Kotex packaging is sharp!”  Silence.  Then, apparently mistaking the silence as a request for clarification, he continued, “You know, the black packages?  They are really cool looking!”  More silence.  Based on a quick survey of their expressions, everyone seemed to be thinking the same thing, <em>What is an 18 year old guy doing talking about feminine hygiene products?!</em>   <img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-580" title="kotexpkg-Kris" src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/kotexpkg-Kris-300x213.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="213" />

Even as I grabbed my purchase and escaped the awkwardness, I began to contemplate what transpired.  Given that I spend my days knee-deep in shopper sciences, I found the situation quite compelling.  Good packaging should be, in part, disruptive, and the new U by Kotex packaging is definitely that.  The sub-brand is unique in the category, both in shelf presentation and in the “get real” tone of the advertising.  A+ on disruption. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/gender-disruption-boys-like-the-new-kotex-packaging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retail Rollouts: Sustainability is not an Afterthought</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/retail-rollouts-sustainability-is-not-an-afterthought/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/retail-rollouts-sustainability-is-not-an-afterthought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 20:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Rethman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Architecture Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experience Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be most effective, a sustainability initiative must be approached holistically. Sustainability and brand thinking are alike in that they radiate outward from the heart of the business. Just as brand is part of everyone’s job, sustainability can be too. Both brand and sustainability strategies are ideally intertwined, well thought out and well executed from vision to prototype. Typically, companies with this kind of forethought get high marks for differentiation and credibility, such as Whole Foods Market and Starbucks. There’s a direct benefit to the value of the brand. <a href="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Oak_leaves.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-503" title="Oak_leaves" src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Oak_leaves-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a> 

Whether a company has a long history of social responsibility or a newly awakened desire to conserve resources, there are trusted ways to make decisions based on return on investment. If a large fleet of stores is in need of image refreshing, that’s an opportunity to look at controlling energy costs and sustainable building strategies. Even stores primarily in tenant spaces can look at a healthier environment and LEED certification. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/retail-rollouts-sustainability-is-not-an-afterthought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Shopper Marketing is Too Aspirational for Most Brands</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/why-shopper-marketing-is-too-aspirational-for-most-brands/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/why-shopper-marketing-is-too-aspirational-for-most-brands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 20:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Chidley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopper Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Brand Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopper insights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Companies under pressure to stem margin erosion may jump headfirst into shopper marketing before they are ready. In doing so, they could overlook the need to solve fundamental problems in the shopping experience and end up with unpredictable results in the store.

<img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-492" title="jump-girl" src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/jump-girl-300x276.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="276" />The urge to dive in is understandably tempting. Brands that invest in shopper marketing are seeing three times the return as compared to traditional marketing disciplines. But the discussion revolves around a very small percentage of brands, such as CVS/pharmacy and Mars Snackfoods, ShopRite and Kellogg’s, Walgreens which just announced it will engage in a shopper marketing pilot with The Hershey Company, and of course the eminence of shopper marketing, Procter &#038; Gamble. All have been working on shopper marketing for years and have an extremely high level of expertise.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/why-shopper-marketing-is-too-aspirational-for-most-brands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Brands Build Digital Bonds with their Shoppers</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/how-brands-build-digital-bonds-with-their-shoppers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/how-brands-build-digital-bonds-with-their-shoppers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Gonsior</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Brand Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopper Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Retailers looking for great examples of wirelessly connecting with their shoppers have three great brands to look to: American Eagle Outfitters, Netflix and Amazon.com. The continue to differentiate their shopping experiences with intimacy, responsiveness and relevance.

<img src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Lynns-Post-300x200.jpg" alt="" title="Lynn&#039;s-Post" width="300" height="200" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-458" />Even with millions of items for sale, Amazon connects intimately with customers, from its one-click ordering to its ability to become more relevant with each visit. The result is a “barrier to exit” that other brands envy. 

American Eagle excels at aggressively integrating multi-channel marketing tactics into both its traditional and digital campaigns. It connects at all the right touchpoints, which goes a long way towards achieving brand loyalty. This year, AE included a mobile filed in its loyalty program, and used mobile as a point of entry into sweepstakes as well as an alerts program. Calls to action were posted on social networking sites, such as Facebook and Twitter in the form of banner ads, status updates and tweets.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/how-brands-build-digital-bonds-with-their-shoppers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Takes a Strong Brand is to Inspire Shopper Confidence</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/it-takes-a-strong-brand-is-to-inspire-shopper-confidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/it-takes-a-strong-brand-is-to-inspire-shopper-confidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Wartell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopper Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Brand Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopper insights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While we can all agree that price matters more to the consumer than ever, it’s not the be-all, end-all of shopping. At some point, the hunt for best price has to stop. And why it stops is up to the retail brand.

Shoppers attach to brand, not price. Brand—the distinct way you do business—needs to provide a reason to activate the purchase, a reason beyond price. It can be trust, convenience, fun, effortlessness, time savings, fashion or many other factors a brand makes itself known for.

Many retailers have learned the hard way that price-based competition is simply not sustainable. To survive, they need a balanced value proposition unique to the brand that makes the shopper confident she has found the right choice among similar offerings of the product or solution she seeks.

<img class="alignleft" title="Justin's-Post" src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Justins-Post-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" />This year, retailers have made headway in the battle against “sameness” by negotiating exclusive famous name brands, making sure their private labels stand for something besides “cheaper” and by infusing the shopping experience with emotional appeal. One brand that renewed its value-plus-reason image is Old Navy. After veering off into fast fashion inspired by the designer runway, it has returned to bright basic family apparel surrounded and supported by its kitschy sense of humor. Shoppers are returning to the store and business is on the upswing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/it-takes-a-strong-brand-is-to-inspire-shopper-confidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don’t Chase Shoppers, Engage Them with Creativity</title>
		<link>http://www.designforum.com/don%e2%80%99t-chase-shoppers-engage-them-with-creativity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.designforum.com/don%e2%80%99t-chase-shoppers-engage-them-with-creativity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jeffrey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retail Brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopper Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designforum.com/?p=428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.designforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Scotts-post.jpg" alt="" title="Scott&#039;s-post" width="375" height="217" class="alignright size-full wp-image-460" />Copying the latest “hot” retailer is an easy way to stay current, to level the playing field. But imitation doesn’t keep you at the top of the shopper’s mind. When a retail brand displays a unique, creative energy—the <a href="http://www.jcrew.com/AST/Navigation/tribeca/ls2.jsp">J. Crew Liquor Store</a> comes to mind—I get a dose of inspiration like an electric charge. I’m not just browsing now, I’m fully engaged because a particular creative spirit permeates every touchpoint for an unmistakable experience. That’s when the brand stops chasing and starts engaging. Maybe it’s my emotions, my ego, or my sense of fun which is always looking to come out and play.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.designforum.com/don%e2%80%99t-chase-shoppers-engage-them-with-creativity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
